POR or stonechip?
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2015 3:48 pm
So, continuing the definitive POR15 thread, I've just started stripping down a fuel tank for prep. It's been painted previously with POR15, but it hasn't adhered to the stonechip rubberised paint that the underside of the tank was originally painted with. Due to the age, there are chip and dings in the tank that have got surface rust despite the stonechip.
Stonechip of course provides some insulation against this (the clue is in the name) and I don't want to compromise the robustness of the tank for the sake of rustproof paint, but I've already seen that the POR doesn't like sticking to the stonechip; it was peeling off in long rubbery strips. Was this just because whoever did the deed didn't prep the surface sufficiently for the POR to adhere? Or should I basically strip it right back to bare metal and start from scratch? And then what? Will the POR be strong enough to replace the stonechip altogether, or should I POR-coat it and then overcoat with stonechip?
Opinions welcome, given how rare fuel tanks are already I want this one to be done right and last a thousand years, lol
Stonechip of course provides some insulation against this (the clue is in the name) and I don't want to compromise the robustness of the tank for the sake of rustproof paint, but I've already seen that the POR doesn't like sticking to the stonechip; it was peeling off in long rubbery strips. Was this just because whoever did the deed didn't prep the surface sufficiently for the POR to adhere? Or should I basically strip it right back to bare metal and start from scratch? And then what? Will the POR be strong enough to replace the stonechip altogether, or should I POR-coat it and then overcoat with stonechip?
Opinions welcome, given how rare fuel tanks are already I want this one to be done right and last a thousand years, lol